Bot traffic: atxtechtrends.com

all sites · all domains · last 15 days

All sites · All Domains · Visit atxtechtrends.com

Who is really visiting atxtechtrends.com?

Between Oct 23 and Nov 6, atxtechtrends.com received 24,429 requests. About 97% came from automated software and about 1.8% look like real people.

That works out to about 147 human visitors, roughly 10 a day, who opened 162 pages between them. 13 of them read more than one page.

The biggest source is scanners hunting for security holes. They try the same list of common weak spots on every site they find.

Bottom line: the hit counts on the All Domains worksheet are almost entirely bots. Use the human visitor figure here to judge this site's real audience.

97%of requests from bots
147human visitors (estimate)
162pages opened by people
24,429total requests, 15 days

Where the requests came from

People 1.8%Named bots 34%Disguised bots 17%Scanners 46%Unclear 1.4%

Requests per day

PeopleNamed botsDisguised botsScannersUnclear
01,0002,0003,0004,000Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

Human visitors per day

Same days, people only, on their own scale so they are visible.

06121824Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

The breakdown

SourceRequestsΣ 24,429ShareData sentBlockedby the serverWhat this means
Break-in scanners6,37726%1 MB31Probing for WordPress logins, password files and other common weak spots.
Scanners posing as browsers4,93520%16 MB11Other requests from an address also caught probing for weak spots.
Disguised scrapers3,43414%27 MB10Claims to be a normal browser but only downloads pages, never the images or icons a real browser fetches, reads many pages without ever clicking a link, or runs from a cloud provider.
SEO and marketing tools2,96112%6 MB1,900Commercial tools that sell data about websites.
Other named bots2,3249.5%11 MB14Any other software that identifies itself as a bot.
Search engines2,0898.6%12 MB0Crawlers that say who they are, such as Google, Bing, Apple and Amazon. Usually welcome: this is how people find the site.
AI crawlers9293.8%3 MB32AI companies gathering pages or answering a user's question, and saying so.
Scripts and tools5972.4%14 MB0Programs such as curl or Python, or anything with an unrecognizable name.
Likely people3791.6%31 MB0Opened a page and also fetched its images or icons, at a human pace, from a non-cloud address.
Unclear3441.4%7 MB0Browser name, but fetched only an image or data file and no page. Could be either.
Possibly people590.2%<1 MB0Read 1 to 3 pages, arrived from a search engine or social link, no icons fetched. Referrers can be faked, so treat these as maybe.
App link sweepers10.0%<1 MB0Touches only login, app or embed links and no actual content.

Named bots

Botas it names itselfTypeRequests
SemrushBotSEO and marketing tools1,888
SERankingBacklinksBotSEO and marketing tools1,000
QlyzeBotOther named bots974
PetalBotSearch engines849
Amzn-SearchBotSearch engines514
ClaudeBotAI crawlers399
ElevenlabsCrawlerOther named bots277
bingbotSearch engines252
GooglebotSearch engines221
OAI-SearchBotAI crawlers198
ExaSearchBotOther named bots114
ibou-searchOther named bots93
SecurityResearchOther named bots92
pathscanOther named bots89
SeznamBotSearch engines76

What people opened

Pages opened by at least two different human visitors.

PageHuman visitors
/97
/live/12
/news/2026-06-04-austin-police-escorts-oversized-loads-construction-boom.html3
/faq/2
/social/2
/news/2026-05-24-asml-hutto-texas-semiconductor-austin-chip-corridor.html2
/sitemap/2
/news/2026-05-13-avride-federal-investigation-austin-av-safety-scrutiny.html2
/videos2

How people arrived

Referring siteHuman visitors
memsist.com21
m.baidu.com18
www.google.com15
duckduckgo.com4
www.bing.com4
search.yahoo.com3
search.yahoo.co.jp1

Where disguised bots operate from

Address blocks, not individual addresses. A heavily used block with many addresses suggests one operator rotating through them.

Address blockRequestsAddresses used
192.42.0.0/1623442
47.82.0.0/16204195
23.180.0.0/16981
66.249.0.0/167016
47.79.0.0/166459
5.102.0.0/16553
43.130.0.0/164532
149.102.0.0/16401

Day by day

DayHuman visitorsHuman pagesNamed botsrequestsDisguisedrequestsScannersrequestsUnclearrequestsAllrequestsBot share
Oct 2317171,064579455342,19596%
Oct 241415266261560151,13496%
Oct 253366313073988098%
Oct 2613132422553,165163,70599%
Oct 2721214782901,032241,86796%
Oct 2888380323443171,18297%
Oct 291212456391213121,09097%
Oct 30910521229378401,21093%
Oct 3177813261718251,83498%
Nov 166480176689151,37598%
Nov 21214837217468311,60395%
Nov 3910226230882151,37198%
Nov 41414344286683531,42292%
Nov 5773243161,020241,70298%
Nov 6551,20988533141,85998%

How this was measured

Every request in the server log was sorted by what it did, not only what it claimed to be. Bots that name themselves are counted as named. Anything claiming to be a browser had to act like one: open a page, fetch its images or icons, move at human speed, and come from outside the big cloud providers. These are estimates. A careful bot can pass the test, and a person with images blocked or a cached icon can fail it, so read the human figures as a good approximation, not an exact count. One person using two devices counts as two visitors. Google Analytics-style tools would show different numbers because most bots never run their script. Logs are kept for 15 days.

Built 2026-11-06 22:42 UTC from 15 log files.