Bot traffic: bastropfiber.com

all sites · all domains · last 15 days

All sites · All Domains · Visit bastropfiber.com

Who is really visiting bastropfiber.com?

Between Oct 23 and Nov 6, bastropfiber.com received 12,161 requests. About 96% came from automated software and about 2.5% look like real people.

That works out to about 156 human visitors, roughly 10 a day, who opened 221 pages between them. 53 of them read more than one page.

The biggest source is scanners hunting for security holes. They try the same list of common weak spots on every site they find.

The busiest day was Oct 28, with 2,267 requests, of which 20 came from people.

Bottom line: the hit counts on the All Domains worksheet are almost entirely bots. Use the human visitor figure here to judge this site's real audience.

96%of requests from bots
156human visitors (estimate)
221pages opened by people
12,161total requests, 15 days

Where the requests came from

People 2.5%Named bots 15%Disguised bots 26%Scanners 55%Unclear 1.3%

Requests per day

PeopleNamed botsDisguised botsScannersUnclear
06251,2501,8752,500Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

Human visitors per day

Same days, people only, on their own scale so they are visible.

06121824Oct 23Oct 25Oct 27Oct 29Oct 31Nov 2Nov 4Nov 6

The breakdown

SourceRequestsΣ 12,161ShareData sentBlockedby the serverWhat this means
Break-in scanners3,93532%1 MB0Probing for WordPress logins, password files and other common weak spots.
Scanners posing as browsers2,81423%5 MB11Other requests from an address also caught probing for weak spots.
Disguised scrapers2,00316%21 MB2Claims to be a normal browser but only downloads pages, never the images or icons a real browser fetches, reads many pages without ever clicking a link, or runs from a cloud provider.
Scripts and tools1,0949.0%4 MB1Programs such as curl or Python, or anything with an unrecognizable name.
Other named bots6735.5%5 MB12Any other software that identifies itself as a bot.
Search engines6635.5%4 MB3Crawlers that say who they are, such as Google, Bing, Apple and Amazon. Usually welcome: this is how people find the site.
AI crawlers3893.2%2 MB1AI companies gathering pages or answering a user's question, and saying so.
Possibly people1671.4%1 MB2Read 1 to 3 pages, arrived from a search engine or social link, no icons fetched. Referrers can be faked, so treat these as maybe.
Unclear1561.3%1 MB0Browser name, but fetched only an image or data file and no page. Could be either.
Likely people1361.1%<1 MB0Opened a page and also fetched its images or icons, at a human pace, from a non-cloud address.
SEO and marketing tools1261.0%<1 MB91Commercial tools that sell data about websites.
No name given50.0%<1 MB0Requests that give no software name at all.

Named bots

Botas it names itselfTypeRequests
OAI-SearchBotAI crawlers207
PetalBotSearch engines200
bingbotSearch engines140
GooglebotSearch engines114
Amzn-SearchBotSearch engines86
ExaSearchBotOther named bots85
SemrushBotSEO and marketing tools55
ChatGPT-UserAI crawlers53
QlyzeBotOther named bots53
ShapBotOther named bots50
leakix.netOther named bots48
DuckDuckBotSearch engines42
GPTBotAI crawlers40
ClaudeBotAI crawlers40
SeznamBotSearch engines35

What people opened

Pages opened by at least two different human visitors.

PageHuman visitors
/78
/plans-pricing/23
/coverage/18
/installation-guide/9
/smithville/7
/bastrop/6
/datacenter/4
/case-study/4
/faq/3
/alternatives/3
/cedar-creek/2
/speed-guide/2

How people arrived

Referring siteHuman visitors
www.google.com85
m.baidu.com19
duckduckgo.com13
bastropbeat.com11
www.bing.com4
search.yahoo.com2
nextdoor.com1
com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox1
html.duckduckgo.com1
safe.menlosecurity.com1

Where disguised bots operate from

Address blocks, not individual addresses. A heavily used block with many addresses suggests one operator rotating through them.

Address blockRequestsAddresses used
192.42.0.0/1613319
158.69.0.0/16962
183.207.0.0/16502
185.220.0.0/16477
117.132.0.0/16421
43.130.0.0/163022
148.135.0.0/16261
5.102.0.0/16242

Day by day

DayHuman visitorsHuman pagesNamed botsrequestsDisguisedrequestsScannersrequestsUnclearrequestsAllrequestsBot share
Oct 2377871211181635392%
Oct 241013907682491,02497%
Oct 25227311110920794%
Oct 262331182207632111,07295%
Oct 2711161632101,369151,77898%
Oct 2813182179921,02992,26799%
Oct 291723182239332578496%
Oct 3077111159924121,22498%
Oct 31914105111164740594%
Nov 112151561352671258595%
Nov 261094109220544495%
Nov 315231161185571383695%
Nov 4132111911586935690%
Nov 5910952152171455495%
Nov 68116118401027290%

How this was measured

Every request in the server log was sorted by what it did, not only what it claimed to be. Bots that name themselves are counted as named. Anything claiming to be a browser had to act like one: open a page, fetch its images or icons, move at human speed, and come from outside the big cloud providers. These are estimates. A careful bot can pass the test, and a person with images blocked or a cached icon can fail it, so read the human figures as a good approximation, not an exact count. One person using two devices counts as two visitors. Google Analytics-style tools would show different numbers because most bots never run their script. Logs are kept for 15 days.

Built 2026-11-06 22:42 UTC from 15 log files.